ChatGPT and the unbundling of online search

Since the announcement of ChatGPT in November, there’s been plenty of talk about the new OpenAI large-language model (LLM) spelling doom for Google Search. The speculation has only gotten more intense following the latest report about Microsoft working plans to incorporate ChatGPT into its Bing search engine.

There are many motives to consider that ChatGPT-powered Bing (or another search engine) won’t significantly be a threat to Google’s near-monopoly on search. LLMs face a variety of critical issues to resolve before they are able to be successful in the field of online search. While Google’s share in the market for search and its technical expertise as well as the financial strength of its resources could allow it stay in the game (and perhaps even dominant) in the near future, as conversationsal LLMs begin to establish themselves in the world of online search.

Unmute Advanced Settings Fullscreen Pause Up Next
In the meantime, the true (and not widely discussed) possibility for LLMs like ChatGPT could be their “unbundling” of online search and is where the real potential to Microsoft or other firms exist. Through by integrating ChatGPT into their products that are successful businesses can cut down on the usage cases for Google Search.

Integration of ChatGPT into search engines
Although ChatGPT is an amazing technology, it faces a number of fundamental issues that are also found with other LLMs. This is the reason Google is already using comparable technology has chosen to take the conservative route of the integration of chat-based LLMs within the search engines it uses.

As numerous researchers and users have observed, LLMs such as ChatGPT are able to “hallucinate,” generating answers that are grammatically coherent, but are logically incorrect.
LLMs do not reference their sources, making it challenging to verify and verify the authenticity of their work.
The cost of operating LLMs are enormous. As per one estimation that has 1 million users daily, ChatGPT costs around $100,000 each day.
LLMs can be slow to operate. Databases for search engines can deliver millions of results in milliseconds. LLMs require a few seconds to respond.
LLMs aren’t always up-to-date. Google has the ability to upload millions of data to its index every hour , at almost free. LLMs have to go through costly and slow retraining each time they need to be updated with the latest information (ChatGPT’s training data date back to 2021).
A company such as Microsoft could be able to solve these issues using its extremely efficient Azure cloud and by implementing appropriate LLM designs, techniques for training and other tools.

Microsoft and OpenAI could also be able to address the problem of authenticity by introducing automated security measures that check ChatGPT’s answers prior to displaying the results as Bing results.

However, nothing can stop Google from doing exactly the exact similar thing. Google has a wealth of data and computing resources, as well as an extremely skilled AI team. Google additionally has the benefit having the status of the primary search engine for Chrome as well as the majority of Android devices, and Safari (included in macOS as well as iOS gadgets). This means that , unless it’s substantially better than Google than a ChatGPT-powered Bing won’t persuade users to take the extra step to switch to Google Search.

Unbundling search
Users use Google Search to solve various issues, from finding nearby eateries to finding academic articles, finding news articles, searching historical data, seeking codes and other advice, and so on.

ChatGPT along with other LLMs could also help assist in solving these issues. We’re already seeing this occur in the field of software development. If developers need assistance creating code to solve a particular problem, they will usually seek it out on Google or go to a coding forum like Stack Overflow.

Today with the help of GitHub Copilot as well as OpenAI Codex, they just have to write a written description within the integrated development environment (IDE) (that means, Visual Studio Code or GitHub Codespaces) and let the LLM generate code automatically for their application. This lets developers remain in the loop by avoiding the need to switch between the IDE in order to use Google search. This is an illustration how to “unbundling” some of the tasks which Google Search is undertaking.

There are numerous other ways to debundle search within LLMs like the development of assistants for academic writing essays, research papers and other content creation. Unbundling offers many advantages:

It permits customization. It permits for customization. LLM can be tailored to the particular application it’s integrated with. This increases the precision of the output from the LLM and permits the smaller model to be used, which significantly reduces the cost.
Unbundling can reduce the time it takes to update. Insofar as users don’t anticipate the LLM to have the most current information It won’t need to be updated often.
Businesses can stay out of direct competition from Google’s massive search engine. Instead they can capitalize on their existing market. For instance, Microsoft could integrate ChatGPT as a tool to assist users in Office, Visual Studio, Teams and other applications which collectively have millions of users. Other platforms for content can spot potential in friction points where users must switch between their applications to Google search results to find content. One of those issues might be resolved by integrating an LLM in the app.
The integration model can unlock innovative business strategies. Google search makes money through its massive advertising network. Integrated LLMs could be monetized by other methods, such as subscriptions. Like Copilot illustrates that if the LLM improves productivity and helps save time, people will be more willing to pay a monthly cost to use it.

The future of search engines
In many cases in many cases, Google’s list of blue links will continue to be the primary tool. For example, if need to conduct a precise search on specific domains or durations, Google’s technology is superior to currently available LLMs.

Unbundling isn’t an imminent danger to Google search for a while. In fact, the experience of major platforms like Craigslist and Amazon illustrates that unbundling generally leads to the growth of a market (and Google already has a stake in many of these markets). But, it could weaken Google’s position in the online information market in a certain extent.

And over the long-term, LLMs can trigger more radical shifts in the market.

Leave a Comment